# Kong vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kong | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 19 in API Management | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 44 323 ✓ | 17 187 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +132 ✓ | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 3.9.4 · 12 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Lua | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Kong scores 81/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.

Kong ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Kong needs more configuration.

Kong is growing faster right now (+132 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kong](https://selfhost.directory/project/kong) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kong.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Kong vs Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-vs-traefik)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-vs-upptime