KongvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kong | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 19 in API Management | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 44 323 | 17 187 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +132 | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | 3.9.4 · 12 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Lua | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Kong scores 81/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.
Kong ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Kong needs more configuration.
Kong is growing faster right now (+132 stars in 30 days).
Kong details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep Kong, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with