# Kong vs OpenBao

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kong | OpenBao |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 19 in API Management | #3 of 12 in Secrets Management |
| GitHub stars | 44 317 ✓ | 8 756 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +131 | +1 285 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | 3.9.4 · 12 Oct 2026 | v2.7.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Lua | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Kong scores 81/100 against 76/100 for OpenBao, so it is the safer default.

OpenBao ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Kong.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenBao is easier to run; Kong needs more configuration.

OpenBao is growing faster right now (+1 285 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kong](https://selfhost.directory/project/kong) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kong.md)
- [OpenBao](https://selfhost.directory/project/openbao) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openbao.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Kong vs Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-vs-traefik)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-vs-openbao