# Kong Gateway vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kong Gateway | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 39 in API Gateway | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 44 314 | 89 708 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +128 | +2 419 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | 3.9.4 · 12 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Lua | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 82/100 for Kong Gateway, so it is the safer default.

World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Kong Gateway.

If you want the quickest setup, Kong Gateway is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 419 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kong Gateway](https://selfhost.directory/project/kong-gateway) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kong-gateway.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-gateway-vs-world-monitor