Kong GatewayvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kong Gateway | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 39 in API Gateway | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 44 314 | 8 650 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +128 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 1 |
| Latest release | 3.9.4 · 12 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Lua | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Kong Gateway scores 82/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
Kong Gateway ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Kong Gateway needs more configuration.
Kong Gateway details →Workout.cool details →