# Kong Gateway vs WeTTY

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kong Gateway | WeTTY |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 39 in API Gateway | #7 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 44 318 ✓ | 5 478 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +128 ✓ | +29 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | 3.9.4 · 12 Oct 2026 | v4.2.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Lua | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Kong Gateway scores 82/100 against 68/100 for WeTTY, so it is the safer default.

WeTTY ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Kong Gateway.

If you want the quickest setup, WeTTY is easier to run; Kong Gateway needs more configuration.

Kong Gateway is growing faster right now (+128 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kong Gateway](https://selfhost.directory/project/kong-gateway) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kong-gateway.md)
- [WeTTY](https://selfhost.directory/project/wetty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wetty.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-gateway-vs-wetty