# Kong Gateway vs voidaccess

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kong Gateway | voidaccess |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 39 in API Gateway | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 44 317 ✓ | 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +131 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | 3.9.4 · 12 Oct 2026 | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Lua | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Kong Gateway scores 82/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.

voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Kong Gateway.

If you want the quickest setup, Kong Gateway is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.

Kong Gateway is growing faster right now (+131 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kong Gateway](https://selfhost.directory/project/kong-gateway) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kong-gateway.md)
- [voidaccess](https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-gateway-vs-voidaccess