# Kong Gateway vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kong Gateway | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 39 in API Gateway | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 44 316 | 47 724 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +130 ✓ | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | 3.9.4 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Lua | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Kong Gateway scores 82/100 against 76/100 for Text Generation WebUI, so it is the safer default.

Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Kong Gateway.

If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; Kong Gateway needs more configuration.

Kong Gateway is growing faster right now (+130 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kong Gateway](https://selfhost.directory/project/kong-gateway) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kong-gateway.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-gateway-vs-text-generation-webui