Kong GatewayvsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kong Gateway | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 39 in API Gateway | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 44 316 | 47 724 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +130 | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 |
| Latest release | 3.9.4 · 12 Oct 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Lua | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Kong Gateway scores 82/100 against 76/100 for Text Generation WebUI, so it is the safer default.
Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Kong Gateway.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; Kong Gateway needs more configuration.
Kong Gateway is growing faster right now (+130 stars in 30 days).
Kong Gateway details →Text Generation WebUI details →