# Kong Gateway vs Stash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kong Gateway | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 39 in API Gateway | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 44 314 ✓ | 13 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +128 | +302 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | 3.9.4 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Lua | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Kong Gateway scores 82/100 against 78/100 for Stash, so it is the safer default.

Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Kong Gateway.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; Kong Gateway needs more configuration.

Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kong Gateway](https://selfhost.directory/project/kong-gateway) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kong-gateway.md)
- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-gateway-vs-stash