# Kong Gateway vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kong Gateway | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 39 in API Gateway | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 44 319 ✓ | 29 390 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +129 ✓ | +111 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | 3.9.4 · 12 Oct 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Lua | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Kong Gateway scores 82/100 against 78/100 for SRS, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Kong Gateway.

## Details

- [Kong Gateway](https://selfhost.directory/project/kong-gateway) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kong-gateway.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-gateway-vs-srs