# Kong Gateway vs PeerTube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kong Gateway | PeerTube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 39 in API Gateway | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 44 314 ✓ | 15 372 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +128 ✓ | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | 3.9.4 · 12 Oct 2026 | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Lua | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Kong Gateway scores 82/100 against 75/100 for PeerTube, so it is the safer default.

PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Kong Gateway.

If you want the quickest setup, Kong Gateway is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.

Kong Gateway is growing faster right now (+128 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kong Gateway](https://selfhost.directory/project/kong-gateway) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kong-gateway.md)
- [PeerTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-gateway-vs-peertube