# Kong Gateway vs PanWatch

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kong Gateway | PanWatch |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 39 in API Gateway | #3 of 9 in Fintech |
| GitHub stars | 44 318 ✓ | 2 270 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +128 ✓ | +119 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | 3.9.4 · 12 Oct 2026 | 0.20.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Lua | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Kong Gateway scores 82/100 against 62/100 for PanWatch, so it is the safer default.

PanWatch ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Kong Gateway.

If you want the quickest setup, PanWatch is easier to run; Kong Gateway needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Kong Gateway](https://selfhost.directory/project/kong-gateway) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kong-gateway.md)
- [PanWatch](https://selfhost.directory/project/panwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/panwatch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-gateway-vs-panwatch