# Komga vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Komga | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 118 in Media Server | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 6 790 | 15 908 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +102 ✓ | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.29.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Kotlin | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Komga scores 73/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

Komga ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; Komga needs more configuration.

Komga is growing faster right now (+102 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Komga](https://selfhost.directory/project/komga) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/komga.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/komga-vs-transfersh