# Komga vs SonarQube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Komga | SonarQube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 6 797 | 11 125 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 ✓ | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | 1.29.2 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Kotlin | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Komga scores 73/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.

Komga ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.

If you want the quickest setup, Komga is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Komga](https://selfhost.directory/project/komga) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/komga.md)
- [SonarQube](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/komga-vs-sonarqube