# Komga vs sandboxed.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Komga | sandboxed.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 118 in Media Server | #97 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 6 796 ✓ | 678 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | 1.29.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | android-v1.21.1 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Kotlin | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Komga scores 73/100 against 50/100 for sandboxed.sh, so it is the safer default.

Komga ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for sandboxed.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, Komga is easier to run; sandboxed.sh needs more configuration.

Komga is growing faster right now (+106 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Komga](https://selfhost.directory/project/komga) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/komga.md)
- [sandboxed.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/sandboxedsh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sandboxedsh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/komga-vs-sandboxedsh