KomgavsQFieldCloud
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Komga | QFieldCloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 6 796 | 246 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 10 |
| Latest release | 1.29.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | v26.29 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Kotlin | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Komga scores 73/100 against 54/100 for QFieldCloud, so it is the safer default.
Komga ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QFieldCloud.
If you want the quickest setup, Komga is easier to run; QFieldCloud needs more configuration.
Komga is growing faster right now (+106 stars in 30 days).
Komga details →QFieldCloud details →
Swap a project
Keep Komga, compare it with
Keep QFieldCloud, compare it with