# Komga vs MikroDash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Komga | MikroDash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 118 in Media Server | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 6 797 ✓ | 633 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | 1.29.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.8.78 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Kotlin | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Komga scores 73/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.

Komga ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for MikroDash.

If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; Komga needs more configuration.

Komga is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Komga](https://selfhost.directory/project/komga) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/komga.md)
- [MikroDash](https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/komga-vs-mikrodash