# Koma vs Stash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Koma | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 18 in Video Processing | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 298 | 13 308 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +302 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 41/100 for Koma, so it is the safer default.

Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Koma.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; Koma needs more configuration.

Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Koma](https://selfhost.directory/project/koma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/koma.md)
- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/koma-vs-stash