# Koma vs PaddleOCR

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Koma | PaddleOCR |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 18 in Video Processing | #1 of 4 in OCR |
| GitHub stars | 298 | 91 926 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +485 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 41/100 for Koma, so it is the safer default.

PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Koma.

If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; Koma needs more configuration.

PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+485 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Koma](https://selfhost.directory/project/koma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/koma.md)
- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/koma-vs-paddleocr