# Koma vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Koma | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 59/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 18 in Video Processing | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 298 | 550 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +34 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenReader scores 59/100 against 41/100 for Koma, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Koma.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; Koma needs more configuration.

OpenReader is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Koma](https://selfhost.directory/project/koma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/koma.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/koma-vs-openreader