# Koma vs opencut

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Koma | opencut |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 18 in Video Processing | #2 of 12 in Video |
| GitHub stars | 298 | 96 664 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +6 109 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | ffmpeg-8.1.3-1 · 24 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

opencut scores 75/100 against 41/100 for Koma, so it is the safer default.

opencut ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Koma.

If you want the quickest setup, opencut is easier to run; Koma needs more configuration.

opencut is growing faster right now (+6 109 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Koma](https://selfhost.directory/project/koma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/koma.md)
- [opencut](https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/koma-vs-opencut