# Koma vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Koma | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 18 in Video Processing | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 298 | 93 286 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +58 012 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 41/100 for Koma, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Koma.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; Koma needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 012 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Koma](https://selfhost.directory/project/koma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/koma.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/koma-vs-omnivoice-studio