# Koma vs Libation

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Koma | Libation |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 68/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 18 in Video Processing | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 298 | 6 375 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +154 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 33 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | — | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Libation scores 68/100 against 41/100 for Koma, so it is the safer default.

Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Koma.

If you want the quickest setup, Libation is easier to run; Koma needs more configuration.

Libation is growing faster right now (+154 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Koma](https://selfhost.directory/project/koma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/koma.md)
- [Libation](https://selfhost.directory/project/libation) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/libation.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/koma-vs-libation