# Kokoro FastAPI vs Zigbee2MQTT

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kokoro FastAPI | Zigbee2MQTT |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 5 610 | 15 762 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +133 ✓ | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Zigbee2MQTT scores 76/100 against 69/100 for Kokoro FastAPI, so it is the safer default.

Zigbee2MQTT ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Kokoro FastAPI.

If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; Zigbee2MQTT needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Kokoro FastAPI](https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi.md)
- [Zigbee2MQTT](https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kokoro-fastapi-vs-zigbee2mqtt