# Kokoro FastAPI vs wyoming-piper

> Two self-hosted [Text to Speech projects](https://selfhost.directory/text-to-speech), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kokoro FastAPI | wyoming-piper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 5 607 ✓ | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +132 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Kokoro FastAPI scores 69/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.

wyoming-piper ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Kokoro FastAPI.

If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; wyoming-piper needs more configuration.

Kokoro FastAPI is growing faster right now (+132 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kokoro FastAPI](https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi.md)
- [wyoming-piper](https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-piper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-piper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kokoro-fastapi-vs-wyoming-piper