# Kokoro FastAPI vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kokoro FastAPI | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 5 611 | 8 552 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +134 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 69/100 for Kokoro FastAPI, so it is the safer default.

Kokoro FastAPI ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Kokoro FastAPI](https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kokoro-fastapi-vs-tube-archivist