# Kokoro FastAPI vs torqvoice

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kokoro FastAPI | torqvoice |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech | #4 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 612 ✓ | 45 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +135 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 22 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.2.64 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Kokoro FastAPI scores 69/100 against 42/100 for torqvoice, so it is the safer default.

torqvoice ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Kokoro FastAPI.

If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; torqvoice needs more configuration.

Kokoro FastAPI is growing faster right now (+135 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kokoro FastAPI](https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi.md)
- [torqvoice](https://selfhost.directory/project/torqvoice) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/torqvoice.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kokoro-fastapi-vs-torqvoice