# Kokoro FastAPI vs tapflow

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kokoro FastAPI | tapflow |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech | #4 of 10 in Testing |
| GitHub stars | 5 608 ✓ | 1 364 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +133 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Kokoro FastAPI scores 69/100 against 55/100 for tapflow, so it is the safer default.

Kokoro FastAPI ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for tapflow.

If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; tapflow needs more configuration.

Kokoro FastAPI is growing faster right now (+133 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kokoro FastAPI](https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi.md)
- [tapflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kokoro-fastapi-vs-tapflow