# Kokoro FastAPI vs ruTorrent

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kokoro FastAPI | ruTorrent |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech | #4 of 12 in Bittorrent |
| GitHub stars | 5 608 ✓ | 2 188 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +133 ✓ | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v5.3.19 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Kokoro FastAPI scores 69/100 against 62/100 for ruTorrent, so it is the safer default.

ruTorrent ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Kokoro FastAPI.

If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; ruTorrent needs more configuration.

Kokoro FastAPI is growing faster right now (+133 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kokoro FastAPI](https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi.md)
- [ruTorrent](https://selfhost.directory/project/rutorrent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rutorrent.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kokoro-fastapi-vs-rutorrent