# Kokoro FastAPI vs rebacklogs

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kokoro FastAPI | rebacklogs |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech | #36 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 607 ✓ | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +132 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.3.3 · 6 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Kokoro FastAPI scores 69/100 against 43/100 for rebacklogs, so it is the safer default.

Kokoro FastAPI ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for rebacklogs.

If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; rebacklogs needs more configuration.

Kokoro FastAPI is growing faster right now (+132 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kokoro FastAPI](https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi.md)
- [rebacklogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/rebacklogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rebacklogs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kokoro-fastapi-vs-rebacklogs