Kokoro FastAPIvsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kokoro FastAPI | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 604 | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +129 | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 21 |
| Latest release | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Kokoro FastAPI scores 69/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Kokoro FastAPI.
If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
Kokoro FastAPI details →ReadMeABook details →
Swap a project
Keep Kokoro FastAPI, compare it with
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with