# Kokoro FastAPI vs Rainbond

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kokoro FastAPI | Rainbond |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 10 in PaaS |
| GitHub stars | 5 611 | 6 284 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +134 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.10.0-release · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Kokoro FastAPI scores 69/100 against 64/100 for Rainbond, so it is the safer default.

Kokoro FastAPI ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Rainbond.

If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; Rainbond needs more configuration.

Kokoro FastAPI is growing faster right now (+134 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kokoro FastAPI](https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi.md)
- [Rainbond](https://selfhost.directory/project/rainbond) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rainbond.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kokoro-fastapi-vs-rainbond