# Kokoro FastAPI vs n8n

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kokoro FastAPI | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 5 608 | 208 914 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +133 | +3 105 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 205 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | n8n@3.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

n8n scores 92/100 against 69/100 for Kokoro FastAPI, so it is the safer default.

n8n ships more often: 205 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Kokoro FastAPI.

If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; n8n needs more configuration.

n8n is growing faster right now (+3 105 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kokoro FastAPI](https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi.md)
- [n8n](https://selfhost.directory/project/n8n) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/n8n.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kokoro-fastapi-vs-n8n