# Kokoro FastAPI vs mitmproxy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kokoro FastAPI | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 5 612 | 46 475 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +135 | +1 331 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 69/100 for Kokoro FastAPI, so it is the safer default.

Kokoro FastAPI ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; mitmproxy needs more configuration.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 331 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kokoro FastAPI](https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi.md)
- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kokoro-fastapi-vs-mitmproxy