# Kokoro FastAPI vs Koma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kokoro FastAPI | Koma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech | #15 of 18 in Video Processing |
| GitHub stars | 5 611 ✓ | 298 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +134 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Kokoro FastAPI scores 69/100 against 41/100 for Koma, so it is the safer default.

Kokoro FastAPI ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Koma.

If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; Koma needs more configuration.

Kokoro FastAPI is growing faster right now (+134 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kokoro FastAPI](https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi.md)
- [Koma](https://selfhost.directory/project/koma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/koma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kokoro-fastapi-vs-koma