# Koha vs Typst

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Koha | Typst |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Library Management | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 596 | 56 869 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +140 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Perl | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Typst scores 82/100 against 61/100 for Koha, so it is the safer default.

Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Koha.

If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; Koha needs more configuration.

Typst is growing faster right now (+140 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Koha](https://selfhost.directory/project/koha) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/koha.md)
- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/koha-vs-typst