Kohavsspacedrive
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Koha | spacedrive | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Library Management | #4 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 596 | 39 336 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +309 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Perl | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
spacedrive scores 70/100 against 61/100 for Koha, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, spacedrive is easier to run; Koha needs more configuration.
spacedrive is growing faster right now (+309 stars in 30 days).
Koha details →spacedrive details →
Swap a project
Keep Koha, compare it with
Keep spacedrive, compare it with