# Koha vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Koha | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Library Management | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 596 ✓ | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +34 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Perl | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Koha scores 61/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Koha.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; Koha needs more configuration.

OpenReader is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Koha](https://selfhost.directory/project/koha) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/koha.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/koha-vs-openreader