# Koha vs Librum

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Koha | Librum |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Library Management | #5 of 7 in E-book Management |
| GitHub stars | 596 | 5 318 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 ✓ | +-2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Perl | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Koha scores 61/100 against 60/100 for Librum, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Librum is easier to run; Koha needs more configuration.

Koha is growing faster right now (+7 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Koha](https://selfhost.directory/project/koha) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/koha.md)
- [Librum](https://selfhost.directory/project/librum) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/librum.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/koha-vs-librum