# kodus vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | kodus | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 10 in Code Review | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 544 | 89 753 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +128 | +2 414 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 89 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | selfhosted-2.2.6 · 23 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 64/100 for kodus, so it is the safer default.

kodus ships more often: 89 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 414 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [kodus](https://selfhost.directory/project/kodus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kodus.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kodus-vs-world-monitor