# kodus vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | kodus | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 10 in Code Review | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 543 | 95 309 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +127 | +2 347 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 89 ✓ | 25 |
| Latest release | selfhosted-2.2.6 · 23 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 64/100 for kodus, so it is the safer default.

kodus ships more often: 89 stable releases in the past year, against 25 for Stirling-PDF.

If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; kodus needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 347 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [kodus](https://selfhost.directory/project/kodus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kodus.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kodus-vs-stirling-pdf