# Kitana vs Resume-Matcher

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kitana | Resume-Matcher |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #78 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 531 | 28 913 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +405 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.4.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | SCSS | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Resume-Matcher scores 81/100 against 46/100 for Kitana, so it is the safer default.

Resume-Matcher ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Kitana.

If you want the quickest setup, Resume-Matcher is easier to run; Kitana needs more configuration.

Resume-Matcher is growing faster right now (+405 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kitana](https://selfhost.directory/project/kitana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kitana.md)
- [Resume-Matcher](https://selfhost.directory/project/resume-matcher) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/resume-matcher.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kitana-vs-resume-matcher