Kill BillvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kill Bill | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 13 in Billing | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 5 826 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 6 |
| Latest release | killbill-0.24.22 · 28 Sept 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 68/100 for Kill Bill, so it is the safer default.
Kill Bill ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, Kill Bill is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Kill Bill details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep Kill Bill, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with