# Kill Bill vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kill Bill | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 13 in Billing | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 5 828 | 35 812 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +67 | +851 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | killbill-0.24.22 · 28 Sept 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 68/100 for Kill Bill, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Kill Bill.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+851 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kill Bill](https://selfhost.directory/project/kill-bill) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kill-bill.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kill-bill-vs-seaweedfs