# Kestra vs statusnook

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kestra | statusnook |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 30 053 ✓ | 988 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 737 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 59 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.3.45 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Kestra scores 82/100 against 51/100 for statusnook, so it is the safer default.

Kestra ships more often: 59 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for statusnook.

If you want the quickest setup, statusnook is easier to run; Kestra needs more configuration.

Kestra is growing faster right now (+1 737 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kestra](https://selfhost.directory/project/kestra) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kestra.md)
- [statusnook](https://selfhost.directory/project/statusnook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/statusnook.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Kestra vs prefect](https://selfhost.directory/compare/kestra-vs-prefect)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kestra-vs-statusnook