# Kestra vs PanWatch

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kestra | PanWatch |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #3 of 9 in Fintech |
| GitHub stars | 30 053 ✓ | 2 269 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 737 ✓ | +118 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 59 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.3.45 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 0.20.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Kestra scores 82/100 against 62/100 for PanWatch, so it is the safer default.

Kestra ships more often: 59 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for PanWatch.

If you want the quickest setup, PanWatch is easier to run; Kestra needs more configuration.

Kestra is growing faster right now (+1 737 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kestra](https://selfhost.directory/project/kestra) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kestra.md)
- [PanWatch](https://selfhost.directory/project/panwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/panwatch.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Kestra vs prefect](https://selfhost.directory/compare/kestra-vs-prefect)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kestra-vs-panwatch