# Kestra vs ibl.ai/os

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kestra | ibl.ai/os |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #65 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 30 053 ✓ | 793 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 737 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 59 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.3.45 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.182.2 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Kestra scores 82/100 against 55/100 for ibl.ai/os, so it is the safer default.

Kestra ships more often: 59 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for ibl.ai/os.

If you want the quickest setup, Kestra is easier to run; ibl.ai/os needs more configuration.

Kestra is growing faster right now (+1 737 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kestra](https://selfhost.directory/project/kestra) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kestra.md)
- [ibl.ai/os](https://selfhost.directory/project/os-2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/os-2.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Kestra vs prefect](https://selfhost.directory/compare/kestra-vs-prefect)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kestra-vs-os-2