# Kestra vs Opencast

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kestra | Opencast |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #38 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 30 059 ✓ | 509 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 724 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 59 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.3.45 · 27 Oct 2026 | 20.5 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | ECL-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Kestra scores 82/100 against 57/100 for Opencast, so it is the safer default.

Kestra ships more often: 59 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Opencast.

If you want the quickest setup, Kestra is easier to run; Opencast needs more configuration.

Kestra is growing faster right now (+1 724 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kestra](https://selfhost.directory/project/kestra) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kestra.md)
- [Opencast](https://selfhost.directory/project/opencast) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opencast.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Kestra vs prefect](https://selfhost.directory/compare/kestra-vs-prefect)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kestra-vs-opencast