# Keploy vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Keploy | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Testing | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 18 882 | 93 041 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +217 | +1 294 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 29 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | v3.6.171 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 74/100 for Keploy, so it is the safer default.

Keploy ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Keploy needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 294 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Keploy](https://selfhost.directory/project/keploy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/keploy.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/keploy-vs-uptime-kuma